In order to deter would be attackers, the U.S. is not able to respond, and it gives attackers more time to collect information and cause damage. When attacks are not even detected, the U.S. The failure to detect cyber intrusions is a serious threat to U.S. government should prioritize expanding its capabilities to identify when cyber intrusions have occurred, and increase information sharing between the private and public sector on intelligence gathered about cyber threats. Additionally, it notes the significance of working with allies and partners on cyber issues, especially in upholding and shaping new global norms in cyberspace. The Interim National Security Strategy does highlight the threat cyber attack sР’В can pose, and states the need to make cybersecurity a top priority. cyber strategy should be defensive in nature, focusing on identifying threats, and recruiting and retaining talented cybersecurity personnel. Beyond outlining responses to cyber attacks, U.S. plans to use РІР‚Сљ a mix of tools seen and unseen РІР‚Сњ against Russia. In an interview with Face the Nation on CBS, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan announced that the U.S. government once they are aware that they may be the victim of a cyber intrusion. government also want to require mandatory disclosures by private companies to the U.S. Potential responses are expected to go beyond just sanctions to include revealing or freezing assets secretly held by Putin and improving government agenciesРІР‚в„ў cybersecurity. While SolarWinds is seen as an information collection operation, Neuberger is worried that it could have (and may have) progressed to a more threatening operation, potentially giving Russia the ability to alter or destroy data. President BidenРІР‚в„ўs new national security advisor for cyber and emerging threats, Anne Neuberger, has stated that the White House is preparing a response to the SolarWinds attack. still needs a comprehensive strategy to identify and impose punitive action against attackers. cyber strategy, especially in implementing consequences against cyber attackers, the U.S. Cyber attacks also face the issue of attribution, as it is often difficult to determine exactly who is behind the attack, especially as attacks carried out by non-state actors complicate response and retaliation issues.

If a cyber attack is responded to in-kind, this could quickly escalate into a cyber war. Issues in Cyber EscalationР”Вue to the nascent nature of cyber conflict, there are neither strict guidelines on what constitutes an attack nor a proper response. Since 2016 Russia has only become more emboldened in its cyber attacks, secure in the knowledge that it will not yet face any devastating consequences in retaliation. Russia continued to increase its cyber operations, most notably in 2016 with the hacking and release of emails from Democratic Party officials. This attack left over 225,000 Ukrainians without power, and even sabotaged power distribution equipment, further hindering attempts to restore power. Russia continued to expand its cyber attacks when it devastated UkraineРІР‚в„ўs critical infrastructure in 2015. In 1996, Russia began organizingР’В cyber attacksР’В with the Moonlight Maze attack. Russian Cyber Operations Are Not a New Phenomenon

cyber strategy that supplements national policy and outlines the necessity of identifying cyber intrusions, Russia and other countries will continue to leverage cyber attacks against the U.S. Without a coherent and comprehensive U.S. The SolarWinds hacking campaign was exposed just months ago, and the United States is still discovering the extent of the attack as the new details come to light. The SolarWinds hacking campaign, suspected to have been carried out by Russia, has exemplified the need to fully integrate an effective cyber strategy into national security policy and reduce cyber escalation risks.

Solarwinds hack technical details